
It's the same with Insights Discovery - also based on Jung's psychological types.. Organisations seem to want to just get the badge by sheep dipping their staff into shorter and shorter sessions and hoping something will stick. When asked "How are you going to measure the success of this?" there is often a stunned silence!
I have been privy to a few Gallop Q12 results recently and the main issue for employees is lack of development. The majority of the feedback at the end of a session when delivered by seasoned professional trainers who value personal development is 'Too short, not enough time and we want more of this.'
Too often it is a one-off to tick the box which causes more damage in that staff feel that there is no commitment to helping them develop themselves at work. Companies need to realise that they are going to lose their top talent if they don't provide the development they crave.
Hi Andy
I couldn't agree more. Training in a "sheep dip" fashion (love the expression!) is worse than pointless - it's actually damaging to the very people that it should be helping, as well as to the organisations who pay for it.
One of the most powerful things we do, as often as possible, is staying in touch with delegates from your courses, via private "client only" micro-sites, video and telephone calls, and follow-up training sessions. Our longest-standing client, who is also one of the most enlightened, always budgets for follow-up and, in most cases, this involves getting the group together again after 3-6 months, reviewing the progress that has been made, and further developing their personal action plans.
It's a tough market out there, and it's easy to offer a quick sheep-dip training course, but we actually undermine what we do, every time we do it.
Thanks again for your comment. Simon.
'Sheep dipping' - fantastic phrase!
You can probably hear my 'amen' from here!
Quite often, when we do an MBTI session (BTW we pretty much only do Step 2 stuff now) we get told "I've done it before but I can't remember much about it". At that point I roll my eyes... if you can't remember much, how can you have been using it? And if you've not been using it, what was the point of the training!?
For us, it's all about the benefits, not the model, not the process... that said, the model and the process are how one can give people the benefits! :)
A major problem we come across is the people who commission the training demanding that we fit it into (say) an hour. While I can easily explain the (basics) of MBTI in an hour, it's just not possible to embed it into people's behaviours and so on without exercises and tiiimmmeeeeee!
Hi Simon - thanks for your comment.
I too can't even begin to count the number of times I've heard "I've done it before but I can't remember much about it". Unless the trainer helps to deliver real, practical insight into what it means for each and every individual, it's a pointless, theoretical exercise. It also, unfortunately, can give solid, respectable, useful training tools a bad name - simply because of the way they are (mis)used.
On that note, you might be interested in this: www.trainingreality.co.uk/blog/bad-modelling.shtml
As for the idea of delivering MBTI in an hour - it's akin to someone listening to The Infinite Monkey Cage" and expecting to understand quantum mechanics (well, not quite, but you get the point!).
I'll drop you an e-mail later today - perhaps it's worth meeting up for a chat?
Thanks again, Simon.